Skip to content

Rigid Pavement Empirical Design Example

Reviewed by licensed engineers

Checked against its sources by licensed professional engineers on the previous site, where reviewers weren’t recorded by name.

How articles are reviewed

Design a new rigid pavement for a major interstate highway using the following conditions (four lanes each direction):

Table 1.
Pavement locationUrban
Pavement functional classificationInterstate
Number of lanes3 lanes in each direction
Traffic distributionAssume 80% of the loading occurs in the design lane
Annual growth rateAssume 2%
Design periodInvestigate 20, 30 and 40 year design periods
Construction MaterialsPCC E_c = 31,026 MPa (4,500,000 psi) PCC S’_c = 5.17 MPa (750 psi)
Load TransferUse dowel bars and assume J = 3.2
Overall serviceability lossp_o – p_t = 4.5 – 3.0 = 1.5
ReliabilityInvestigate three levels: R = 90%, R = 95%, R = 99%. This represents a typical range of reliability levels encountered for Interstate highways.
o0.40
Drainage coefficient (Cd)1.0 (usually assumed if no better data exist)
Loss of support1.0
Traffic countSingle unit trucks (assume 0.34 ESALs per truck) = 1872/day Double unit trucks (assume 1.00 ESALs per truck) = 1762/day Truck trains – trucks with more than 2 units (assume 2.60 ESALs per truck) = 247/day

Design ESALs

The standard multiplier to calculate compound growth is:

multiplier=(1+g)n−1g\text{multiplier} = \frac{(1+g)^n-1}{g}
890,000[(1+0.02)20−10.02]≅22,000,000890{,}000\left[\frac{(1+0.02)^{20}-1}{0.02}\right]\cong 22{,}000{,}000
890,000[(1+0.02)30−10.02]≅36,000,000890{,}000\left[\frac{(1+0.02)^{30}-1}{0.02}\right]\cong 36{,}000{,}000
890,000[(1+0.02)40−10.02]≅54,000,000890{,}000\left[\frac{(1+0.02)^{40}-1}{0.02}\right]\cong 54{,}000{,}000

Calculate the Effective Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k) This calculation is a multi-step process In the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. Basically, the steps are as follows:

  1. Determine the roadbed resilient modulus and the subbase elastic modulus and use these values along with a projected slab thickness to graphically determine a "composite modulus of subgrade reaction" (k_:).
  2. Modify this k_: to account for the effects of a rigid foundation near the surface. The idea here is that the subgrade will offer greater support if a rigid foundation (such as bedrock) is located very near the surface.
  3. Determine how this modified composite modulus of subgrade reaction (or "k-value") varies throughout a typical year. Typically this is done by season or by month.
  4. Using a projected slab thickness and a modulus of subgrade reaction that has been modified to account for the effects of a rigid foundation near the surface, use a graph to determine the relative influence the various k-values throughout the year will have on pavement performance. Lower values of k, indicating less support, are potentially more damaging than higher values of k, indicating more support. Therefore, lower values of k are weighted more heavily in determining the weighted average.
  5. Correct the weighted average k-value to account for the potential loss of support arising from subbase erosion. Subbase materials that are more prone to eroding will result in a larger downward correction to the k-value determined in step 4.

The 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures and its associated graphs are needed to carry out this procedure because most steps involve graphical solutions. Although these graphs are not reproduced here, a summary results table is shown below.

Table 2.
MonthM_RSubbase M_RComposite kRelative Damage (u_r)
January86 MPa (12,500 psi)3,447 MPa (500,000 psi)95095
February86 MPa (12,500 psi)3,447 MPa (500,000 psi)95095
March86 MPa (12,500 psi)3,447 MPa (500,000 psi)95095
April86 MPa (12,500 psi)3,447 MPa (500,000 psi)1,00092
May103 MPa (15,000 psi)3,447 MPa (500,000 psi)1,00092
June103 MPa (15,000 psi)3,447 MPa (500,000 psi)1,00092
July103 MPa (15,000 psi)3,447 MPa (500,000 psi)1,00092
August103 MPa (15,000 psi)3,447 MPa (500,000 psi)1,00092
September103 MPa (15,000 psi)3,447 MPa (500,000 psi)1,00092
October103 MPa (15,000 psi)3,447 MPa (500,000 psi)95092
November86 MPa (12,500 psi)3,447 MPa (500,000 psi)95095
December86 MPa (12,500 psi)3,447 MPa (500,000 psi)95095

average relative damage

=

u‾r=(6×95)+(6×0.92)12=93\overline{u}_r = \frac{(6\times 95)+(6\times 0.92)}{12} = 93

Based on Figure 3.5 in the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, k ˜ 980.

Based on Figure 3.6 in the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures a Loss of Support = 1.0 results in keffk_{eff} ˜ 250.

Use the 1993 AASHTO Empirical Equation Using the previously calculated ESAL results and the 1993 AASHTO empirical rigid pavement design equation the following pavement thickness designs can be calculated:

Table 3.
Design PeriodDesign Period ESALsPavement LayerLayer Thickness
Reliability = 90%Reliability = 95%Reliability = 99%
20 years22,000,000PCC Surface Course280 mm (11 inches)305 mm (12 inches)330 mm (13 inches)
HMA Base Course100 mm (4 inches)100 mm (4 inches)100 mm (4 inches)
Crushed Stone Subbase Course135 mm (5.4 inches)135 mm (5.4 inches)135 mm (5.4 inches)
30 years36,000,000PCC Surface Course305 mm (12 inches)320 mm (12.5 inches)355 mm (14 inches)
HMA Base Course100 mm (4 inches)100 mm (4 inches)100 mm (4 inches)
Crushed Stone Subbase Course135 mm (5.4 inches)135 mm (5.4 inches)135 mm (5.4 inches)
40 years54,000,000PCC Surface Course330 mm (13 inches)345 mm (13.5 inches)380 mm (15 inches)
HMA Base Course100 mm (4 inches)100 mm (4 inches)100 mm (4 inches)
Crushed Stone Subbase Course135 mm (5.4 inches)135 mm (5.4 inches)135 mm (5.4 inches)

In this particular example, which only shows one set of possible solutions, the HMA base course and crushed stone subbase course layer depths were kept constant and the PCC surface course depth was varied depending upon requirements. Notice that a change in reliability level from 90% to 99% results in a PCC slab thickness increase of about 50 mm (2 inches). The 380 mm (15 inch) thick slab shown for the 40-year design (99% reliability) is probably near the maximum practical slab thickness for highway pavements.

Calculator

1993 AASHTO rigid pavement design

1993 AASHTO Guide, Part II §3.2

Finds the PCC slab depth that carries the design traffic at the chosen reliability.

Units
Traffic and reliability

Rigid-pavement ESALs in the design lane over the design period.

Typically 0.30 to 0.40 for rigid pavements.

Serviceability
Concrete and support

3.2 for doweled jointed pavement with asphalt shoulders.

Example values: the 1993 Guide’s Figure 3.7 example.

Teaching this? Figures and worked examples are free to use with credit. How to cite

Cite this page

APA

Pavement Interactive. (2018, August 1). Rigid pavement empirical design example. HeadLight. Retrieved [the date you read it], from https://pavementinteractive.org/reference-desk/design/structural-design/rigid-pavement-empirical-design-example/

ASCE

Pavement Interactive. (2018). “Rigid Pavement Empirical Design Example.” HeadLight, <https://pavementinteractive.org/reference-desk/design/structural-design/rigid-pavement-empirical-design-example/> ([the date you read it]).

BibTeX

@misc{pavint-rigid-pavement-empirical-design-example,
  author = {{Pavement Interactive}},
  title = {Rigid Pavement Empirical Design Example},
  year = {2018},
  publisher = {HeadLight},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pavementinteractive.org/reference-desk/design/structural-design/rigid-pavement-empirical-design-example/}},
  note = {Accessed [date]}
}
This address will not change. The citation records the date you read it.
Report an error

Reports go to the editors, who check them against the cited sources. Corrections are noted at the top of the article.

Only if you want a reply. It is not published.