Skip to content

Acceptance

Reviewed by licensed engineers

Checked against its sources by licensed professional engineers on the previous site, where reviewers weren’t recorded by name.

How articles are reviewed

"Acceptance" is a formal procedure used to decide whether work should be accepted, rejected, or accepted at a reduced payment (Freeman and Grogan, 19981). Specifically, it is the monitoring method used to determine whether or not a particular process is meeting quality standards; it is not, however, a form of quality control. Acceptance procedures simply accept or reject things based on their quality; they do not ensure proper quality standards. Thus, they should never be used as a method to control or improve quality; process controls are used to control and systematically improve quality (Montgomery, 19972). Often, the term "quality assurance" is used to refer to what is here defined as "acceptance". While this is fine (and many organizations do this) the standard AASHTO definitions are used here meaning that the term "quality assurance" refers to the all-encompassing idea that includes "quality control", "independent assurance" and "acceptance" as its three key components.

Acceptance procedures can take one of the following three broad forms: (Montgomery, 19972):

  1. Accept with no inspection is generally used when there is no economic justification to look for defective units or material.
  2. 100 percent inspection is generally used where components or material are extremely critical and passing any defective components or material would result in an unacceptably high failure cost.
  3. Acceptance sampling is generally used when there is some economic justification to look for defective material and either (1) some small finite percentage of defective material is acceptable or (2) it is not economical or practical to use 100 percent inspection. Acceptance sampling uses statistics to estimate information about a large amount of material from a small random sample.

Pavement construction typically uses acceptance sampling and thus, many specifications are statistically based. Statistical Acceptance Specifications takes a more in-depth look at these types of specifications.

Teaching this? Figures and worked examples are free to use with credit. Course reading lists

Cite this page

APA

Pavement Interactive. (2026, November 1). Acceptance. HeadLight. Retrieved [the date you read it], from https://pavementinteractive.org/reference-desk/qc-qa/quality-assurance/acceptance/

ASCE

Pavement Interactive. (2026). “Acceptance.” HeadLight, <https://pavementinteractive.org/reference-desk/qc-qa/quality-assurance/acceptance/> ([the date you read it]).

BibTeX

@misc{pavint-acceptance,
  author = {{Pavement Interactive}},
  title = {Acceptance},
  year = {2026},
  publisher = {HeadLight},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pavementinteractive.org/reference-desk/qc-qa/quality-assurance/acceptance/}},
  note = {Accessed [date]}
}
This address will not change. The citation records the date you read it.
Sources (2)
  1. Freeman and Grogan (1998). Statistical Acceptance Plan for Asphalt Pavement Construction. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Washington, D.C. ↩
  2. Montgomery (1997). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 3rd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY. ↩ ↩
Report an error

Reports go to the editors, who check them against the cited sources. Corrections are noted at the top of the article.

Only if you want a reply. It is not published.